Arch 2501 . Fall 2010 . McReynolds
Material x8 / Space x4
November 8, 2010
white light, black shadow
containers & site
November 5, 2010
precedents & containers
November 3, 2010
narrative submission
November 2, 2010
circulation represented
November 1, 2010
narrative explored
black book topics
October 29, 2010
narrative explored
October 28, 2010
atmospheres
1. How does Peter Zumthor talk about the "Magic of the Real" and explain how this compares, in terms of the subtleties, to Michael Benedikt's "Architecture for Reality"?
2. Material Compatibility, Temperature of a Space and Levels of Intimacy are some conditions that both Peter Zumthor, in “Atmospheres”, and Richard Serra, in “Weight and Measure”, make a point of articulating when consider space. Where in their explanation of these overlapping conditions are they similar and where do they differ?
3. Zumthor looks towards experiential conditions when creating architecture, what are other methods architects use when generating architecture and what is the corresponding building?
4. For Zumthor at the end of the day, after figuring use, sound, place, light and the other listed conditions, if the coherence isn’t beautiful the process is started again. Beauty is simultaneously subjective for the individual, as held “in the eye of the beholder”, and universally recognizable. Define your subjective understanding of what beautiful architecture is.
October 27, 2010
grids & drawings
digital grids
October 22, 2010
image submission
CD DUE: 8:30am MONDAY (10.25.2010)
All images > .jpg
All line drawings > .pdf
All boards > .tiff
file format:
Project 01.flatland:
xx_flatland01pointdiagram
xx_flatland02point
xx_flatland03field
xx_flatland04...
Project 02.gait_space:
xx_gaitspace01plan
xx_gaitspace02frame
xx_gaitspace03cast
xx_gaitspace04...
Project 03.memory_place:
xx_memory01plan
xx_memory02section
xx_memory03diagrams
xx_memory04...
Exercise B.two_part_model:
xx_2pmodel01...
xx_2pmodel03...
xx_2pmodel04...
October 19, 2010
generate from section
October 15, 2010
presentation
October 13, 2010
mid-semester review
October 11, 2010
memory writing
October 6, 2010
weight and measure
memory model situated
October 4, 2010
site for memory
weight and measure
October 3, 2010
physical memory models
September 30, 2010
black book topics
September 28, 2010
digital memory model
September 25, 2010
drawings and documentation
September 23, 2010
architectural drawing
September 21, 2010
memory drawing
September 20, 2010
drawing references
September 16, 2010
tools to cast
preparing to cast
September 13, 2010
constructed frame / fabric
September 10, 2010
refining your shoe
Rasmussen reading
light, volume and shadow
black book topics
September 9, 2010
pattern plan
seminar one synthesis
more
September 7, 2010
representation and reality
Stan Allen describes field conditions as “bottom-up phenomena: defined not by overarching geometrical schemas but by intricate local connections.” What are some field condition examples that can be found in the road systems of Lubbock?
In part 1, Allen distinguishes a geometric relationship of classical architecture from an algebraic combination of the Cordoba Mosque. How do these two architectural examples differ?
What are some other examples of field conditions that can be observed around campus?
How does a field condition stand to redefine the relation between figure and round?
What is the reality Michael Benedikt writes about?
Benedikt describes degrees of reality in architecture as: Architecture of Dreams, Architecture of Games, Architecture of Illusions, Architecture of Enactments and Architecture of Jokes. What are some example buildings that fall under these categories?
Benedikt describes “direct esthetic experience of the real” as being moments without symbolism. Where in our environment does symbolism occur and where in our environment is symbolism absent? What is an example of this situation?
Although Benedikt’s position pulls examples from the 70‘s and 80‘s to illustrate that an architecture of reality is polar to the post-modern architecture movement, this condition continues to exist today. Where in the city would be examples of an architecture of reality and post-modern architecture?
The four components that define the “realness” of an architecture for reality are: presence, significance, materiality, and emptiness (in two categories). How do these components relate to architecture? and What are some examples of architectural elements that make up these conditions?